The Presence Of Stress In 12 Angry Men And What Caused It Essays

The Presence Of Stress In 12 Angry Men And What Caused It The Presence of Stress in 12 Angry Men And What Caused It All human beings encounter stress at one point or another in their life. Stress can trigger other emotions that do not necessarily help one in their current situation. Dealing with it can also cause more problems, perhaps even more stress. In the movie 12 Angry Men, 12 jurors are placed in a small, sultry room where they have to come up with a unanimous verdict. After hours of contemplation the men emerge sweaty, stressed out, emotionally drained, and tired from dealing with the stress of the situation. The stress that they felt was a normal reactive response to be present after being put in that situation. The jurors knew that they had an important job to do. Their decision could save or take the life of a man. The situation is an approach-avoidance situation because they could save the life of an innocent man or they could let a guilty man go depending on the decision, which led to the initial stress. For a long amount of time, Juror #8 was trying to convince the other jurors that the boy was not guilty, leading to extreme frustration towards Juror #8 and each other. Some jurors (specifically Juror #3) began to threaten the other jurors. When the Jurors first entered the Jury Room, they felt that they would be in and out after the first vote. When Juror #8 voted not guilty they all became alarmed, they realized that this might take longer than previously thought. At first, as Juror #8 tried to convince them of the chance of probable doubt, they resisted all his attempts. Gradually, one by one, the men became exhausted of fighting against Juror #8 and changed their vote to not guilty, showing their general adaptation system working in the three stages of alarm, resistance and exhaustion. The 12 jurors sat in the room, beginning to analyze every piece of information given to them. Certain jurors had to get over former stereotypes that they possessed before the trial. For example, Juror #3 believes that children have no respect for their parents anymore because they do not address them as sir or madam. Juror #4 made a false declaration about children who come from slummy neighborhoods. He believed that they all will forever be menaces to society and that they will never become a good person. He was flabbergasted when Juror #5 stated that he used to live in the worst of all slums, but today he is a good man. The use of groupthink helped them make a decision on the verdict. They are all part of an organized group that is trying to highlight agreement in this crucial decision. The men cooperated and achieved the goal that they were after, reaching a unanimous verdict of not guilty on probable cause. Even though the men were extremely stressed out about the decision, they were eventually able to rationally make that decision. Stress can slow a person down but it will not shut that person down. When faced with a heavily weighted decision people tend to become stressed out. They spend more time worrying about making the wrong choice than the time they spend wondering what the right choice is. Stress is a normal human feeling that cannot be avoided and will always be present to a certain extent. Cognitive Psychology The jurors were faced with a difficult choice to make , their decision could either save a young man's life or put him to death. Cognitive Psychology focuses on information processing, problem solving and decision-making. The jurors were give an immense amount of information that they had to take in and decide whether the young man was guilty or not. Juror #8 analyzed the information, finding loopholes that no one else did. After sharing all of that information with the other jurors, more loopholes were found by other jurors. The remaining 11 jurors change their charge to not guilty. Amygdala While in the Jury Room the 12 men all became extremely restless with one another. The amygdala is a structure in the limbic system, which is responsible for emotion and aggression. Juror #3 showed

Resistance to Technology essays

Resistance to Technology essays Technology. What would we do without it? Probably have a lot less fun and have a lot shorter life span. Think about it, you couldnt watch Dawsons Creek or Friends every week. That would mean that the lives of millions of teenage girls in America would cease to exist. And yet there are still some people who are afraid of new technology. Theyre afraid of a technology that could improve the lives of Americans just because they saw a couple of science fiction movies where an extremely unlikely situation occurred and all hell broke loose. When in reality precautions are made to ensure that things like that wont happen. Super-intelligent sharks wont become smarter than humans and nearly escape to rule the world like they did in the movie Deep Blue Sea. One technology that people seem to most fear is cloning. Specifically one of my friends raised a good point about the subject, she said that in her high school they had a debate about cloning and the side against cloning stated that if there was an exact genetic clone of yourself and this clone went out and committed a whole bunch of crimes, then how would they know who did it unless you had an alibi. Another thing that people seem to be afraid of when it comes to cloning is the religious aspect. Many see cloning as being too close to playing god. They dont think that specifically sorting out genes and selecting which traits their children will have is morally correct. But theres a flipside to this in that if we can select which traits our children will have, we may be able to eliminate hereditary diseases like cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anemia. It all depends on how the question is phrased. If I were to ask somebody, Should we be able to change the genetic traits of our children, they would most likely respond negatively. However, if the question was phrased as Should ...

Public Health Core Areas and the BSPH Program Essay

Public Health Core Areas and the BSPH Program - Essay Example Evidently, most women in Fulton County did not frequently or, even worse, have never gone or were not able to receive mammography screenings; they have been in the waiting lists for a long time. They eliminated the list and three hundred women received early mammography screening through the funds that Atlanta affiliate organization won (Schmid, 2011). American Public Health Association had a meeting on 2009 November 7-11 in Philadelphia, PA, and it was their 137th meeting. The meeting was about â€Å"The American Public Health Association† and the â€Å"Institute for Public Health and Water Research† coming into partnership and focusing on the importance of water; they had concerns which involved protecting public health. The partnership meant to have happened before the official World Water Day. They wanted to ensure safety in public health through the consumption of clean and safe drinking water (Schmid, 2011). â€Å"American Public Health Association† had their 128th meeting on 2000 November 12-16 in Boston, MA. The meeting was about issues concerning health disparities, for instance, how to eliminate the health disparities. The first thing to be undertaken in order to eliminate health disparities was to implement health reforms from a public health point of view. Another aspect of eliminating disparities that was suggested is that the health system of the nation needed reforms. In addition, they suggested that there be provision of more affordable health care services that are in line with promoting health and preventing diseases (Schmid, 2011). â€Å"American Public Health Association† had a meeting with Committee on Women’s Rights on 2006 November 4-8, in Boston, MA; it took place for the 134th time. The meeting was about empowering women and activities that were going to take place due to the efforts of the Committee on Women’s